La normativa russa sul permesso di soggiorno agli stranieri sieropositivi e il divieto di discrimina
THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares the applications admissible;
3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, read together with Article 8;
4. Holds that the respondent State has not failed to comply with its obligations under Article 34 of the Convention;
5. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, the following amounts, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement:
(i) EUR 15,000 (fifteen thousand euros) to each applicant, plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;
(ii) EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros) to Mr Novruk, EUR 4,000 (four thousand euros) to Ms Kravchenko, EUR 4,320 (four thousand three hundred and twenty euros) to Mr Khalupa, EUR 850 (eight hundred and fifty euros) to Ms Ostrovskaya, and EUR 850 (eight hundred and fifty euros) to Mr V.V., plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants, in respect of costs and expenses;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
6. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction.
Per il testo integrale della decisione, clicca qui.